1
1 SCRANTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING
2
3
4
5 HELD:
6
7 Tuesday, September 8, 2009
8
9 LOCATION:
10 Council Chambers
11 Scranton City Hall
12 340 North Washington Avenue
13 Scranton, Pennsylvania
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
CATHENE S. NARDOZZI, RPR - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
24
25
2
1
2 CITY OF SCRANTON COUNCIL:
3
4
MR. ROBERT MCGOFF, PRESIDENT
5
6 MS. JUDY GATELLI, VICE-PRESIDENT
7
MS. JANET E. EVANS
8
9 MS. SHERRY FANUCCI
10
MR. WILLIAM COURTRIGHT
11
12 MS. KAY GARVEY, CITY CLERK
13
MR. NEIL COOLICAN, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
14
15 MR. AMIL MINORA, SOLICITOR
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3
1 (Pledge of Allegiance recited and
2 moment of reflection observed.)
3 MR. MCGOFF: Roll call, please?
4 MR. COOLICAN: Mrs. Evans.
5 MS. EVANS: Here.
6 MR. COOLICAN: Mrs. Gatelli.
7 MS. GATELLI: Here.
8 MR. COOLICAN: Ms. Fanucci.
9 MS. FANUCCI: Here.
10 MR. COOLICAN: Mr. Courtright.
11 MR. COURTRIGHT: Here.
12 MR. COOLICAN: Mr. McGoff.
13 MR. MCGOFF: Here. Dispense with
14 the reading of the minutes.
15 MS. GARVEY: 3-A. AGENDA FOR THE
16 ZONING HEARING BOARD MEETING HELD ON AUGUST
17 12, 2009.
18 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
19 If not, received and filed.
20 MS. GARVEY: 3-B. TAX COLLECTION
21 COMPARISON REPORTS RECEIVED FROM THE SINGLE
22 TAX OFFICE ON AUGUST 11, 2009.
23 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
24 If not, received and filed.
25 MS. GARVEY: 3-C. APPLICATIONS AND
4
1 DECISIONS RENDERED BY THE ZONING HEARING
2 BOARD MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 12, 2009.
3 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
4 If not, received and filed.
5 MS. GARVEY: 3-D. MINUTES OF THE
6 COMPOSITE PENSION BOARD MEETING HELD ON JULY
7 22, 2009.
8 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
9 If not, received and filed.
10 MS. GARVEY: 3-E. MINUTES OF THE
11 NON-UNIFORM MUNICIPAL PENSION BOARD MEETING
12 HELD ON JULY 22, 2009.
13 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
14 If not, received and filed.
15 MS. GARVEY: 3-F. MINUTES OF THE
16 FIREMEN'S PENSION COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON
17 JULY 22, 2009.
18 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
19 If not, received and filed.
20 MS. GARVEY: 3-G. MINUTES OF THE
21 POLICE PENSION COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON
22 JULY 22, 2009.
23 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
24 If not, received and filed.
25 MS. GARVEY: 3-H. AGENDA FOR THE
5
1 NON-UNIFORM MUNICIPAL PENSION BOARD MEETING
2 HELD ON AUGUST 26, 2009.
3 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
4 If not, received and filed.
5 MS. GARVEY: 3-I. AGENDA FOR THE
6 ZONING HEARING BOARD MEETING TO BE HELD ON
7 SEPTEMBER 9, 2009.
8 MR. MCGOFF: Are there any comments?
9 If not, received and filed.
10 MS. GARVEY: 3-J. CONTROLLER'S REPORT
11 FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2009.
12 MR. MCGOFF: Thank you, Mrs. Garvey.
13 Are there any comments? If not, received
14 and filed. Thank you, Mrs. Garvey. Any
15 announcements from members of counsel? Mrs.
16 Gatelli?
17 MS. GATELLI: Yes. The first thing I
18 would like to announce is the Night Out
19 against crime will be held Tuesday,
20 September 15 at the Tripp Park Complex from
21 5 to 9. It's unfortunate that it's being
22 held on a Tuesday evening when there is
23 council meeting going on because I'm sure
24 most of us go to that fair, and I'm very
25 disappointed that we won't be able to be
6
1 there. Hopefully the meeting will be over a
2 little early next week and we can take a
3 scoot over after the meeting, but I'm glad
4 to see that they are having it. There will
5 be a canine demonstration and parade, the
6 smokehouse from the fire department, free
7 hot dogs and drinks and Tommy the DJ
8 sponsored by the Scranton Police Department.
9 Also, on Sunday, September 20, from
10 noon to seven, will be Lebanese Heritage Day
11 at St. Ann's Marian Church. They will have
12 all kinds of Lebanese food and things for
13 the children, Sumner Avenue and West Price
14 Street in West Scranton, and that's the only
15 announcements I have. Thank you.
16 MS. EVANS: Please remember in your
17 prayers all those who are died in the last
18 month, particularly retired lieutenant Ben
19 Davis, a firefighter who served our city
20 with dedication and professionalism and his
21 dear family and friends he leaves behind.
22 May God show his tender mercies to the Davis
23 family, and especially his son Mark, who is
24 also a Scranton firefighter.
25 This Friday as a nation we
7
1 commemorate the 9/11 attacks against
2 America. I ask you to remember in your
3 prayers all of the victims of this tragedy
4 and their family members who forever suffer
5 their loss. A memorial service will be held
6 at McDade Park at 8 a.m., and a brief
7 service will be held at St. Ann's Basilica
8 at noon.
9 The annual St. Paul's church picnic
10 will be conducted this Friday, Saturday and
11 Sunday, September 11, 12 and 13 on the
12 church grounds at the corner of Marian
13 Street and Penn Avenue. The picnic offers
14 great food, games, raffles and fun for all
15 ages.
16 An AIDS walk will be conducted on
17 September 19 at Nay Aug Park. Registration
18 is $10 and it opens at 10 a.m., and the walk
19 itself begins at 11:30 a.m. All proceeds
20 benefit the Scranton Temple Health Center.
21 Please come out and support this very worthy
22 cause.
23 On Sunday, September 20, from 12 to
24 6 p.m., the Polish Food Festival will be
25 held at St. Stanislaus Youth Center at 530
8
1 East Elm Street in Scranton. The food is
2 out of this world, so treat yourself to some
3 Polish delicacies.
4 Also, I wish to commend all those
5 who worked on the Latino Pride Parade of
6 Events and the Italian Festival in the City
7 of Scranton. Both events were highly
8 successful and Scranton is most proud to
9 serve as their host city.
10 Council received a petition from the
11 residents of Taylor Avenue, Linden Street
12 and North Irving Avenue which opposes the
13 installation of a 40-foot dumpster compactor
14 by the University of Scranton at 322
15 Wenzelli Court. The Court lies between
16 Taylor and North Irving Avenues. Residents
17 object to the odor, noise, and unsightly
18 appearance of the dumpster/compactor. As a
19 council, I believe it is our duty to
20 safeguard the welfare, safety, and peace of
21 mind of Scranton residents, therefore, I
22 would like a letter from Scranton City
23 Council to the University of Scranton with a
24 petition attached requesting the removal of
25 the dumpster compactor with my colleague's
9
1 agreement.
2 MR. COURTRIGHT: Fine by me.
3 MS. GATELLI: Agree.
4 MS. FANUCCI: Second.
5 MS. EVANS: Thank you. And if, Kay,
6 we might also send a letter to licensing and
7 inspections to make sure that they're in
8 contact with the University as well, and
9 this should be moved as soon as possible.
10 Finally, I hope everyone enjoyed a
11 wonderful Labor Day weekend and recognized
12 the significance of our hardworking labor
13 unions both past and present whose sacrifice
14 and commitments to fair labor practices for
15 all working Americans are the backbone of
16 our great country. If you traveled the
17 courthouse square area during the Italian
18 festival, I hope you admired the statute of
19 our ground breaking labor leader John
20 Mitchell who was largely responsible for
21 this American holiday, and that's all.
22 MR. COURTRIGHT: Mr. McGoff, I -- I
23 discussed this with Mr. McGoff earlier, I
24 wanted to do this in the beginning of the
25 meeting so maybe we can get out in front of
10
1 something. Right before we took our break
2 for the summer there was an issue that came
3 up about two grants actually that went out
4 to the Justice Department. What had
5 happened was there was a letter sent to the
6 Justice Department that council was unaware
7 of, I want to read one to you because they
8 are either exactly the same or similar, I
9 should say. This is to Traci Williams from
10 the Justice Department, and the letter is
11 sent by the grant writer the City of
12 Scranton has. Now, keep in mind, the grant
13 writer is part-time for the City of Scranton
14 and full-time for the county.
15 "Let this correspondence serve as
16 official notification that the memorandum of
17 understanding between the City of Scranton,
18 Moosic, South Abington, Carbondale, and
19 Lackawanna County pursuant to the 2009 JAG
20 nonfederal grant was offered into the
21 Scranton City Council Committee on Public
22 Safety, Tuesday, April 7, 2009, and was
23 unanimously approved per Chief David
24 Elliott.
25 Additionally, the memorandum of
11
1 understanding was introduced in the regular
2 minutes of Scranton City Council and made
3 available for the public comment. To date,
4 all public comment has been overwhelmingly
5 positive about the programs intentions per
6 Chief David Elliott. Thank you for your
7 consideration in this manner and please do
8 not hesitate to contact with me with any
9 questions."
10 And it's sent by the grant writer,
11 part-time grant writer for the City of
12 Scranton. That letter was dated May 18th of
13 2009. We have the same letter July 8th of
14 2008. When was discovered through members
15 of the public that asked questions of me,
16 also members of council asked questions of
17 me, I believe it was discovered by the
18 business administration office, what
19 happened was none of this actually happened.
20 We never saw any of this legislation. We
21 didn't see the legislation for 2008. We did
22 not see the legislation for 2009. We did
23 not vote on it. It was not passed
24 unanimously. There was no public comment
25 and they did not receive it overwhelmingly
12
1 because it just simply did not happen.
2 So I went and I spoke with them, and
3 bear with me because it's a little bit
4 lengthy explanation here, I went and I spoke
5 to Mary Theresa Patterson, who is the city
6 solicitor, and she called in Stu Renda, who
7 is the business administrator, and we
8 discussed it and we had a phone conversation
9 with Dave Elliott. Because of the phone
10 conversation that we had with Dave Elliott
11 we had a meeting with Mr. McGoff, myself and
12 Ray Hayes, who is the Director of Public
13 Safety, Mary Theresa Patterson and Dave
14 Elliott and we discussed how could something
15 like this happen.
16 That meeting spawned another meeting
17 which is a meeting, so as you can see we
18 weren't just doing nothing during the break,
19 another meeting with Mr. McGoff, myself,
20 Dave Elliott and the grant writer, again,
21 the part-time grant writer for the county,
22 full-time with the county. That in turn had
23 another meeting resulted from it, and that
24 was with the grant writer, her supervisor
25 from the county, Mr. McGoff, and myself.
13
1 And the reason I bring it up now is
2 because I know there was people from the
3 public that asked questions, and I believe
4 people from the people sent letters to the
5 JAG office, the federal government, and sent
6 letters to our office and I thought I could
7 just give you some information now. So what
8 appears is there was a colossal
9 misunderstanding between the grant writer
10 and Dave Elliott. If there is any further
11 questions I would most certainly be happy to
12 answer them from anybody if you just want
13 explanation when you come to the podium or
14 anybody on council here, but I want to get
15 this out front now so that you know we are
16 not trying to hide anything.
17 Well, the grant is going to be given
18 to us, all right. I believe we need to have
19 an account opened up for it. We didn't have
20 any of the proper procedures done because we
21 did not know about it. We didn't know what
22 they were.
23 MS. EVANS: Mr. Courtright, yes, as
24 you just mentioned there is legislation on
25 tonight's agenda that pertains to the JAG
14
1 grant and I'm very grateful that the city is
2 receiving this money, and I'm going to vote
3 "yes" to introduce it tonight because I know
4 we sorely need these funds. The police
5 department needs more than is even available
6 to us at this point in time, particularly in
7 light of what occurrences have been revealed
8 in the last month, but I'm not -- I realize,
9 okay, there were two letters, you have had -
10 you and Mr. McGoff have had now what was
11 that three meetings over --
12 MR. COURTRIGHT: I have had four.
13 MS. EVANS: Four meetings, okay, and
14 can you explain to me though you said there
15 is a colossal misunderstanding, what is this
16 big misunderstanding? I mean, what is the--
17 please, if you can in detail tell us what
18 this misunderstanding is because my concern
19 since you brought this out publically now is
20 the fact that false information was provided
21 to the Justice Department with regard to
22 Scranton City Council and someone has to be
23 held responsible for that. Do we know, I
24 mean, what's been the end result of the four
25 meetings?
15
1 MR. COURTRIGHT: Okay. I'll be happy
2 to explain it, and again, this is the reason
3 I brought it up because we don't want to
4 look like we are hiding anything, but I
5 would ask Mr. Minora if in my explanation do
6 you think I'm giving information that's
7 confidential and I shouldn't be giving would
8 you jump in?
9 MR. MINORA: I will, but I don't see
10 that this is a personnel matter or
11 litigation. I mean, it's --
12 MR. COURTRIGHT: Okay.
13 MR. MINORA: It's legislation, so if
14 there is a problem --
15 MR. COURTRIGHT: I'll also ask
16 Mr. McGoff if I'm on base then or incorrect
17 because the only meeting he wasn't on was
18 the first one when I spoke to the attorney
19 with the city and Mr. Renda, and I'll try to
20 summarize it and then I will be more than
21 happy to give you more detail if you need it
22 and then further after the meeting give you
23 more detail.
24 My understanding of what has
25 happened is that, and again, please correct
16
1 me if I'm wrong because this is a little bit
2 of a touchy situation, the grant writer was
3 told by the police department that on
4 April 7 we -- council was going to be
5 receiving legislation, all right? And I
6 have to assume that this is the same thing
7 that the grant writer was told in 2008.
8 This happened two years, we didn't catch it
9 the first year and we caught it in 2009. So
10 she was told by Dave that the legislation is
11 going to go before us.
12 What she did was she took an old
13 letter to the Justice Department, I believe
14 maybe 2007, and she merely copied it and put
15 it in the dates, all right? And I asked her
16 in the last meeting that we had, you know,
17 why would you do that, you know, and she
18 said, "Well, that's what I was told. I was
19 told it was going in there."
20 I said, okay, you know, you sent
21 that to the Justice Department -- she sent
22 it to the Justice Department assuming that
23 it went to us because they have told -- Dave
24 Elliott told her it was coming to us. She
25 had no reason to believe otherwise.
17
1 MS. EVANS: Mr. Courtright, just one
2 quick question in case I forget -- or
3 Mr. McGoff, is it the grant writer's job
4 then to notify city council that this
5 legislation should be coming or is it the
6 job of the legal department or the job of
7 the police department, who typically
8 contacts city council to put the legislation
9 on?
10 MR. COURTRIGHT: I checked into this,
11 this was a question brought up and, Kay, now
12 you can correct me if I'm incorrect, what
13 had happened in the past is the police
14 department would send a letter to the law
15 department, the law department would write
16 legislation that would come to us, and then
17 we always passed it and I think the grant
18 writer, you know, assumed we would this
19 time, which I'm sure we would have.
20 MS. EVANS: Oh, yes.
21 MR. COURTRIGHT: But that didn't
22 happen. It went to the law department on
23 2008 and I guess again in 2009, and somehow
24 the business administrator caught it this
25 time. So she had no reason to believe that
18
1 it didn't go to us. I said, well, did you
2 not have to have someone sign off on this?
3 She said it went electronically. I believe,
4 and correct me if I'm wrong here, Bob, the
5 last thing I think she said Dave Elliott got
6 a copy and then a copy goes electronically
7 and then he has access to her e-mail. I
8 don't know, you know, she assumed that it
9 went to us. No one told her differently, so
10 I guess that raises another question.
11 MS. EVANS: Well, Mr. Courtright, I
12 was wondering, as I said, the legislation is
13 included on tonight's agenda and I do know
14 that the city sorely needs this money.
15 MR. COURTRIGHT: Right.
16 MS. EVANS: And it's not my intention
17 to stand in the way of the creation of the
18 account or the acceptance of the grant, but
19 I still have questions about last year's
20 grant, for example, how much was received,
21 where was that money placed and what I am
22 wondering though is before we cast our final
23 vote on this legislation to accept the JAG
24 grant and create the new account for
25 placement therein, would you be able to set
19
1 up a meeting for me with this grant writer
2 and yourself as Chair of the Public Safety
3 Committee because there are a few questions
4 I would like to ask her myself?
5 MR. COURTRIGHT: And maybe that would
6 be a good idea then there would be no
7 miscommunication. I tried to call everyone.
8 I did talk to Judy and Bob was there, I
9 talked to you, Sherry. I didn't get a
10 chance to talk to you. Yeah, I think she
11 is -- would be more than willing to speak
12 with you, I'll ask if --
13 MS. EVANS: Could you set that up for
14 me?
15 MR. COURTRIGHT: When you would be
16 available and I would call her and get the
17 story firsthand.
18 MS. EVANS: Okay.
19 MR. COURTRIGHT: I just know there
20 are people from public, that's why I got
21 people from the public asking questions and
22 I think Bob would agree with me we did not
23 want to look like we were doing anything
24 wrong.
25 MS. EVANS: But we did nothing wrong.
20
1 MR. COURTRIGHT: Right, we didn't.
2 MS. EVANS: We had no part in this.
3 MR. COURTRIGHT: We were unaware of
4 this, and that's one of the great concerns
5 that we had --
6 MS. EVANS: I'm just looking to get
7 to the bottom of it and to --
8 MR. COURTRIGHT: Absolutely.
9 MS. EVANS: -- find out where all of
10 the money is or how the money has been
11 dispersed and --
12 MS. FANUCCI: We did get that.
13 MR. MCGOFF: Can I -- the 2000 -- the
14 2008 JAG money was approved. There has --
15 it has to the been drawn upon as of yet, so
16 there is no money -- it's still --
17 MS. EVANS: Sits somewhere. Do you
18 know where?
19 MR. MCGOFF: It's still with the
20 Department of Justice. There has been no
21 money -- she has not drawn down that amount
22 from 2008.
23 MR. COURTRIGHT: She needs to start
24 the --
25 MS. EVANS: We received a grant, the
21
1 Justice Department maintains those funds and
2 as we need them they are --
3 MS. GATELLI: Drawn now.
4 MS. EVANS: -- applied for or drawn
5 down.
6 MR. MCGOFF: Right.
7 MS. EVANS: And we are saying that in
8 a whole year the police department didn't
9 need to use those funds for any reason?
10 That doesn't seem to hold water.
11 MR. MCGOFF: I'm telling -- you know
12 what, I don't know whether they needed it or
13 not. That money has -- and this is from the
14 grant writer since she is the one that draws
15 the funds --
16 MS. EVANS: Right.
17 MR. MCGOFF: She said that there has
18 been no money drawn from that 2008.
19 MS. EVANS: Well, that's certainly
20 a--
21 MR. MCGOFF: Can I also add to this,
22 that when it was discovered that this
23 letter -- the letter that Mr. Courtright
24 read, when it was discovered that that was
25 part of the application a retraction was
22
1 sent, communication from the grant writer
2 and through Chief Elliott's Office was sent
3 to the Department of Justice. The
4 Department of Justice responded saying
5 basically that fine, procedural error, there
6 was no problem, that it should be presented
7 to council and --
8 MS. EVANS: They were aware we have
9 done this for two consecutive years?
10 MR. MCGOFF: Yes.
11 MR. COURTRIGHT: There should be two
12 letters sent.
13 MR. MCGOFF: For want of a better
14 term, there was a letter of retraction and
15 it did say it was 2008-2009 and the
16 Department of Justice simply said, you know,
17 follow through, make sure it goes to council
18 like there was no -- so we did not lose any
19 funds. There is no recriminations, you
20 know, through the Justice Department. As
21 far as the Justice Department is concerned
22 the situation has been rectified so, that
23 you know, that part of it is, I'm going to
24 say kind of no harm, no foul type-thing.
25 Now, I understand your concern over the
23
1 procedural part of it, but I want --
2 MS. EVANS: Well, the procedural part
3 of it in addition to the fact that monies,
4 let us say, approved by the Justice
5 Department remain untouched for this amount
6 of time had we need Scranton police officers
7 on the street and they need better equipment
8 and we are not touching a grant that was
9 approved for the 2008 year.
10 MS. FANUCCI: There is a lot of
11 reasons for that though, because when we
12 draw federal funds and funds from the state
13 we are only allowed to max out a certain
14 percentage per yea, so just because we were
15 approved doesn't mean that you're able to
16 take it out, we might have been using it in
17 other areas, for instance, they are only
18 certain amount of percentage, in fact, you
19 should write a letter to Stu, maybe Kay can
20 write a letter to Stu, find out what the
21 reason for funding not being used was, and
22 how much we are allowed percentagewise to
23 draw on from the federal government and also
24 from the state for the police officers
25 yearly. That might clear a lot of that up
24
1 because I know -- the same thing happens
2 from the state with us. We can only do so
3 much with this CDBG or want to use for them
4 or any of the cops on the street or --
5 MS. EVANS: I see what you are saying
6 and how that can --
7 MS. FANUCCI: Right, but that's what
8 I mean --
9 MS. EVANS: And maybe if we --
10 MS. FANUCCI: --if you understand
11 that if get from them at your different
12 levels you can't use them because you
13 already used how many --
14 MS. EVANS: And will the Justice
15 Department continue to grant additional
16 funding when they are in possession of
17 information that says, "You have not used a
18 penny of what was granted to you the prior
19 year because you were unable to do so,
20 "because in effect I guess what we're saying
21 is we are overfunded.
22 MS. FANUCCI: No, no, no.
23 MS. EVANS: According to the --
24 according to the formulas that happened --
25 (Whereupon council members began
25
1 speaking on top of on another.)
2 MR. COURTRIGHT: One more thing
3 because I know we off track here, there is
4 some paperwork from the council and -- I
5 think one thing is that I don't know how we
6 would have used the money because there was
7 not a special city account opened to put it
8 into, right, we always make special city
9 account so there has been no legislation.
10 There is no legislation asking us to open a
11 special city council so how could we have
12 drawn down on it, so that's number one.
13 But when I sat this there and asked
14 Stu there was confusion because there are
15 checks being written and I'm telling you
16 there is a pile of stuff here, a pile of
17 stuff here. And maybe just the answer is to
18 have this meeting with this young lady and
19 speak to her and then maybe can you list the
20 questions.
21 MS. EVANS: Yes.
22 MR. COURTRIGHT: Because every time
23 we speak I learn something new and --
24 MS. EVANS: Well, I would like the
25 opportunity I think just to clarify --
26
1 MR. COURTRIGHT: I'll call her
2 tomorrow and see --
3 MS. EVANS: -- for myself that I take
4 it seriously anyway.
5 MR. MCGOFF: Just as an addendum,
6 the stenographer was having a difficult time
7 when were are talking at the same time if we
8 could have a little bit of sympathy for her
9 plight.
10 MS. GATELLI: I think you should
11 schedule her so we can all be there.
12 MS. FANUCCI: Yeah.
13 MR. COURTRIGHT: Okay.
14 MS. GATELLI: If she should come to a
15 caucus.
16 MS. EVANS: If she could attend the
17 public caucus. But, Mr. Courtright, I would
18 still like to continue with --
19 MR. COURTRIGHT: I'll give her a
20 call.
21 MS. EVANS: I'll come into a meeting
22 prior to next week.
23 MR. COURTRIGHT: I go to be honest
24 with you, I'm sorry, I was told, I don't
25 know how comfortable she would be being on
27
1 TV. She was rather nervous when we met with
2 her.
3 MS. GATELLI: We can meet in the
4 office. It doesn't have to be on the TV.
5 MR. COURTRIGHT: Again, I just want
6 to say, this girl works full-time for the
7 county, she is only part-time for us, and I
8 don't want to see her get a bad wrap.
9 MS. EVANS: Mr. Courtright, we have a
10 grant writer. The city employs a grant
11 writer, why was our grant writer not
12 involved in this process. It would seem --
13 if that individual had been -- maybe none of
14 this would have happened because there
15 aren't the actual city procedures in the
16 processes, so --
17 MR. COURTRIGHT: You are right. You
18 right.
19 MR. MCGOFF: May I -- on this one, at
20 least in 2009, and I won't speak for the
21 2008 because I don't know, but the 2009
22 application also included two other -- two
23 or three other municipalities.
24 MR. COURTRIGHT: Right. This is the
25 first one.
28
1 MR. MCGOFF: So it was more of a
2 countywide or -- it was outside of the City
3 of Scranton so that it was done through the
4 grant writer in the county. I know that
5 from the 2009, again, I can't speak for the
6 2008.
7 MS. EVANS: Oh, okay. Thank you.
8 MR. MCGOFF: All right.
9 MR. COURTRIGHT: I'll set it up.
10 MS. EVANS: Thank you.
11 MR. MCGOFF: Sorry for the --
12 MR. COURTRIGHT: I apologize, I just
13 wanted to get that out there.
14 MR. MCGOFF: Citizens' participation.
15 Andy Sbaraglia.
16 MR. SBARAGLIA: Andy Sbaraglia,
17 citizen of Scranton, fellow Scrantonians.
18 There is two articles in the Times that
19 affects your pocketbook. We got a man in
20 charge of the DCED is writing up this
21 revised Recovery Plan, but some of the
22 things that we don't know what's in it, but
23 they did put two articles in the paper what
24 this man was thinking. It proposes
25 expanding the business payroll tax to
29
1 nonprofits, one thing or increasing, this is
2 us, our tax, our 52 tax, the $52 we pay in
3 tax an hour from people working in the city
4 to $145. This is where these man is
5 thinking, so what's happening is under this
6 new revised recovery plan, which I was told
7 we don't get to vote on for some dumb
8 reason, we should write a new one and we
9 should put a new one in, but for some reason
10 we don't get a right to vote on this one.
11 This one just comes, I don't even know if
12 you get to vote on it. I guess we get the
13 Czar in here and he is going to tell us how
14 much taxes we to pay and who has to pay it,
15 but whatever it is people open your eyes.
16 Open your ears and try to get as much
17 information as you can out of this Recovery
18 Plan because it don't come from you. It
19 really don't. It's come out of the paper
20 and affects everybody's pocketbook in this
21 city. What I could say is we are going to
22 get burned.
23 Now, we got another article in here,
24 which is this is bad, six municipal pension
25 plans. I spoke about pension plans maybe
30
1 two years ago that were underfunded, and I
2 guess we are more underfunded now than we
3 were when I spoke two years ago. I quoted
4 something like a loss of 23 million, I
5 believe, and the point is with this recovery
6 for this fixed municipal pension plan,
7 someone has to makeup the pension plans.
8 If they decide that we have to keep
9 this fund at 80 percent, 85 percent, that
10 means someone has to pay, and who is going
11 to pay? Us. All of us. All of us in this
12 city is going to have to pay toward this
13 pension plan. Now, if this is only the city
14 we might be able to take it, but it's also
15 all of the municipal employees, which is a
16 whole different ballgame. I don't know how
17 they are down, but this is the crux. If we
18 get hit trying to bring up all of the state
19 worker's pension plans up, we might as well
20 all declare bankruptcy because we won't be
21 able to afford it, and these are things that
22 should be brought up to all of the people,
23 you should have our state representatives
24 actually come before us and explain to us
25 what they can do and this. As you know,
31
1 some of them are out of work, we all get
2 pensions, at least, okay, I got one. Most
3 of yous I think got one except
4 Mr. Courtright I don't know if he has one,
5 but anyway, we all have to -- we need the
6 pension, there is no question about it. The
7 only question is how much do we have to keep
8 in reserve for these pensions and that's the
9 important thing, to get to your state
10 representatives and you should do it for us.
11 You should contact Mr. Smith or Kevin Murphy
12 and ask them to try to get a formula that we
13 can live with because that's the most
14 important thing we can do because if we get
15 hit with this, plus God knows what our
16 budget is going to be like, who knows.
17 Maybe sky is the limit, who know.
18 Well, I guess I got a few more
19 minutes, you are about to subordinate
20 another loan. You know what I think about
21 subordination. I have been saying that for
22 years and years and years. All you do is
23 protect the banks and they definitely need
24 protection, but the federal government is
25 helping them all, so I don't know why we
32
1 have to protect them, too. Your duty is to
2 protect the taxpayers of the city. We lost
3 millions of dollars already. I don't know
4 if this is a good loan or not a bad loan.
5 The A-Park building is a nice building, I
6 always said it, but when the new owner
7 bought it they kicked out the museum, which
8 is in our basement. Thank you.
9 MS. EVANS: Mr. Sbaraglia, can I see
10 that article that you reading from for a
11 moment, please?
12 MR. SBARAGLIA: You mind if I give it
13 to her?
14 MR. MCGOFF: Please.
15 MR. SBARAGLIA: You can have both of
16 them if you want.
17 MR. MCGOFF: Ozzie Quinn.
18 MR. QUINN: Ozzie Quinn, Taxpayers'
19 Association. First of all, the Taxpayers'
20 Association submitted an application for the
21 tenth year Community Development Block Grant
22 for $7,000 for kids for swim, and I saw the
23 ones that came over from OECD and their
24 recommendation and it wasn't included, okay?
25 I would appreciate it if you would look at
33
1 it. I looked at the Scranton School
2 District numbers and there is 5,200 families
3 that would be able to benefit from this here
4 program. Would someone please consider
5 looking at this here?
6 MS. EVANS: We will doing just that
7 --
8 MR. QUINN: Thank you very much.
9 MS. EVANS: -- Mr. Quinn, in fact,
10 our president tonight asked after tonight's
11 introduction of the proposed CDBG grants
12 that each council member would go through
13 very carefully those that have been selected
14 by the administration versus all of the
15 applicants.
16 MS. FANUCCI: Mrs. Evans, I just want
17 to say it's here. It is here. It's part of
18 our packet. So it's on our list.
19 MS. EVANS: That's what I was saying
20 to you.
21 MR. QUINN: It's what?
22 MS. FANUCCI: It is -- the
23 application it is part of our packet, so it
24 is still active.
25 MR. QUINN: Yeah, but our
34
1 application is not on there.
2 MS. FANUCCI: These are the
3 applications and yours is part of the
4 application process, so it is here.
5 MS. EVANS: Yes, but what he is
6 saying --
7 MS. FANUCCI: We can still vote on it
8 for him.
9 MS. EVANS: Yes, it doesn't matter --
10 MS. FANUCCI: We can still vote on
11 it.
12 MS. EVANS: You were included,
13 indeed, in that the applicants, but between
14 now and final passage of this legislation
15 council will meet and will go over the list
16 presented by the administration, make
17 deletions, additions, in other words, I
18 would be very hesitant to say that what you
19 see on tonight's agenda is what the final
20 passage will include. There will be changes
21 to this made by council I'm sure.
22 MR. QUINN: I appreciate that.
23 MS. EVANS: And I will certainly
24 consider the Kids Swim Free Program. I have
25 appreciated your efforts all of these years
35
1 and I do believe it should be part of the
2 package.
3 MR. QUINN: Thank you very much. The
4 other thing is I wanted to discuss the fact
5 that 5-i in regard to that subordination.
6 You know, Mrs. Fanucci and Mrs. Gatelli, you
7 know, I'm not going to say I gotcha, but I
8 gotcha. You said here publically, okay,
9 that there wasn't any -- everybody was up
10 the snuff in regards to business loans and
11 over since the recess we come up with four
12 or five that have been back two years
13 delinquent, 700 and some thousand dollars
14 total. Now, you people should have known
15 that.
16 MS. FANUCCI: Actually, I believe I
17 did say that Whistles was one, but they did
18 catch up, so that's not true so there was
19 one. I do agree that all indications in the
20 letters we got stated otherwise so --
21 MR. QUINN: Well, you may have been
22 right on Whistle's, I don't know.
23 MS. FANUCCI: We all asked together
24 actually. We sent a letter every time as a
25 body, three times, so we were giving the
36
1 information we were provided with.
2 MR. QUINN: You may be right on that
3 Whistle's, but I'm just saying that there is
4 four properties that's causing $700,000,
5 that's two years and you as the head of the
6 CDBG should have been on top of that.
7 Now, I want to know, give me an
8 explanation why is this bank getting the
9 money and why is the taxpayers again going
10 to be left out? Can somebody explain that
11 on this?
12 MS. EVANS: I can give you a brief
13 run down on -- you are addressing on what's
14 tonight's legislation?
15 MR. QUINN: Yes, please.
16 MS. EVANS: Originally OECD and city
17 council had approved a business loan for
18 this entity for $250,000. It was a
19 mortgage, the city holds that mortgage. At
20 the same time this business had received a
21 $500,000 loan from a bank. Since then I
22 suppose there if we want to call it
23 refinancing they have approached a new bank,
24 they intend to pay off in full their loan
25 with the first bank and in addition to that
37
1 they are going to borrow $300,000 above and
2 beyond the $500,000. So what had once been
3 $500,000 with bank one will now become
4 $800,000 with bank two. The $250,000, I
5 think it might have been a commercial
6 revolving business loan through OECD, still
7 stands, and the city, of course, takes a
8 second position behind the bank in terms of
9 repayment. So it is, you know, just as an
10 aside, it is my belief that the city should
11 be paid for it's loan just as the bank is
12 being paid for it's loan rather than our
13 being carried over endlessly and placed in
14 second and sometimes, not in this event, but
15 sometimes third positions on repayment
16 because, as we can see, the city has been
17 losing miserably on a number of these loans
18 at that were not identified to city council.
19 So actually I'm going to I think be asking
20 under my motions that this piece of
21 legislation is tabled.
22 MR. QUINN: Thank you, I appreciate
23 that. And I just want to mention that there
24 is going to be a sale of property taxes by
25 the county September 21 and there is 600
38
1 from the city. Now, a property owner
2 attached -- contacted me regarding the civil
3 complaint -- could I have a couple -- Mrs.
4 Evans, you spoke, could I have a final say?
5 A civil complaint was filed and ruled on by
6 the SRA as the assignee and the NCC
7 Abrahamsen, who is the lawyer, the person
8 owes $1,584.07 and they are asking for a
9 judgment of $4,586.21. That means that NCC
10 is going to get a profit of $3,214.
11 MS. EVANS: Exactly.
12 MR. MCGOFF: Mr. Quinn --
13 MR. QUINN: Now, I called the other
14 district justices and magistrates -- she
15 gave me time.
16 MS. EVANS: Yes, I told him because I
17 devoured his time.
18 MR. MCGOFF: Well --
19 MR. QUINN: I called them up and
20 they told me that they were also inundated
21 by complaints from the city for collecting
22 taxes. Now, we are not dealing with bricks
23 and mortar here, we are dealing with people.
24 You know, you understand the stress that
25 these people are under or don't you?
39
1 MS. EVANS: I do.
2 MR. QUINN: I know you do. You
3 know, and Mr. Courtright --
4 MR. COURTRIGHT: Yes.
5 MR. QUINN: I know you didn't vote
6 for NCC, did you?
7 MR. COURTRIGHT: I'm sorry, I didn't
8 hear you.
9 MR. QUINN: Did you vote for NCC?
10 MR. COURTRIGHT: For these fees?
11 MR. QUINN: Yeah.
12 MR. COURTRIGHT: No.
13 MS. FANUCCI: I did.
14 MR. QUINN: This is ridiculous, you
15 know. This is utterly ridiculous, and how
16 you can let this go on. Mr. McGoff, you
17 should take the bull by the horns and do
18 something about it. Don't you have any
19 empathy? Not compassion, they don't want
20 compassion, they want empathy. Now, they
21 are getting hit double whammy from the
22 county and the city.
23 MR. MCGOFF: Mr. Quinn, thank you.
24 MR. QUINN: You know, some people, I
25 agree, some people should pay their taxes,
40
1 but there is people out there that are
2 hurting. Thank you.
3 MR. MCGOFF: Les Spindler.
4 MR. SPINDLER: Good evening,
5 Council, Les Spindler. Well, I was going to
6 speak about Chief Elliott, but he was low on
7 my list of priorities tonight, but he moved
8 right to number one after what
9 Mr. Courtright said tonight. It just goes
10 to prove what I've been saying and what a
11 lot of other people have been saying, we
12 have an incompetent police chief. I brought
13 it up a long time ago, he is holding back a
14 report that has the two names of city
15 employees who stole Gary DiBileo's signs,
16 he's not doing anything about that, and he
17 doesn't know how to schedule a national
18 night out. Everybody knew it was
19 August 4th. I knew, council knew, the Tripp
20 Park Neighborhood Association knew, he
21 scheduled it on the wrong night, and this is
22 the police chief we've got? No wonder this
23 city is in shambles.
24 Moving on, talked about KOZ's',
25 since I wasn't here in July I want to read
41
1 something from the July 10 Doherty
2 Newsletter about KOZ's, "What little data
3 are available suggests that Keystone
4 Opportunity Zone Program has produced few
5 jobs and economic development promised by
6 proponents and participants the report
7 reveals."
8 And this is contrary to what
9 Mrs. Fanucci, Mr. McGoff and Mrs. Gatelli
10 feel and we have said it all along the KOZ's
11 are a waste and you people just keep voting
12 for them.
13 Next thing, Holy Cross. A Dioceses
14 that's always complaining they need money
15 and they turned down a $25,000 offer from
16 Bob Bolus. Well, to me there is more than
17 meets the eye with this. I think there is a
18 deal being made between the city and the
19 Diocese, just like the deal that was made
20 for the Genesis Wildlife Center between the
21 city and Lackawanna College, so I don't
22 think you should pass this legislation, it's
23 not right.
24 MS. GATELLI: Mr. Spindler, you
25 weren't here before, but we are voting
42
1 against that. Mr. McGoff, we had a meeting
2 beforehand and --
3 MR. SPINDLER: Okay. And another
4 thing, Mr. McGoff say on the July 28 meeting
5 where the people been for four years. Well,
6 they weren't threatening to demolish it for
7 four years, Mr. McGoff, they were just
8 threatening to demolish it now. That's why
9 nobody was here for the last four years.
10 On August 2 Channel 16 reported a
11 dumpster filled in the alley out back with
12 documents with people social security
13 numbers and other classified information and
14 Ray Hayes says, "We are learning from our
15 mistakes."
16 Well, obviously, they didn't because
17 Ann Marie Stulgis found a load of index
18 cards years ago with social security numbers
19 on it and they didn't learn from that
20 mistake. So, you know, this city
21 administration is just a joke. Oh, and
22 Chris Doherty blamed the summer help. Well,
23 wasn't the summer help supervised or did
24 they just go in the room and throw
25 everything out on their own?
43
1 Okay, on what Ozzie said. I
2 remember specifically not long ago Mrs.
3 Gatelli said all the loans are up-to-date.
4 Well, here is a headline from the Doherty
5 Newsletter: Brannigan's tab $557,000. The
6 city is getting stuck on that, and right
7 after that Michael's Luxury Eyewear and
8 Vidas Tapas Bar also that they owe $214,000.
9 So where is the city going to get this
10 money? We are a distressed city and you
11 three give out loans like you are giving out
12 candy, but what do you do for the taxpayers?
13 You just screw the taxpayers over. You vote
14 for fees and penalties so people lose their
15 houses, you vote for a 25 percent tax hike
16 and yet you vote for these loans for all of
17 these millionaires. You should -- you three
18 are a disgrace.
19 Next on the list. Again, in the
20 Doherty Newsletter", Doherty, Act 47 helps
21 city. Chris Doherty went to Reading and he
22 is giving them financial advice we are over
23 $250 million in long-term debt and he is
24 giving financial advice? What a joke.
25 That's like having an arsonist give advice
44
1 to a fire safety class.
2 Moving on --
3 MS. GATELLI: He's the star tonight.
4 MR. SPINDLER: Okay moving on.
5 MS. GATELLI: You are going to be on
6 YouTube now, Les.
7 MR. SPINDLER: On a serious note,
8 myself and other people have come here for
9 years saying there is gangs in this city,
10 Chief Elliott and Chris Doherty denied it.
11 It took a murder on State Road for Chris
12 Doherty to admit there is gangs in the city,
13 and two of these people came from the high
14 school my daughter is going to which scares
15 me to death. Who knows if there is not more
16 in that school.
17 Can I continue this? Oh, there is
18 article in the paper, the mayor is putting
19 more police officers at the high school
20 games and he says we are being proactive.
21 No mayor, putting more cops the high school
22 games isn't being proactive, proactive would
23 have been if you'd listened to what we said
24 three or four years ago and maybe this
25 murder could have been prevented, and I have
45
1 more but I'll continue on next week. Thank
2 you.
3 MR. MCGOFF: Bob Bolus.
4 MR. BOLUS: Good evening, Council,
5 welcome back. Bob Bolus. I guess we are
6 going to talk about 7-A, so the council I
7 believe is fully aware I had sent a fax that
8 we raised our offer on Holy Cross from
9 $25,000 to $35,000. People said why did you
10 bother to do that? What is our history and
11 our heritage in this city worth? We can't
12 put a dollar sign on it. I don't believe
13 anybody with any common sense seeing our
14 city and where we are going will want to
15 destroy and continue to destroy places that
16 are house of worships or gateways to the
17 city. Gateway churches where people
18 actually starting building around in this
19 city and in communities nationally.
20 The Diocese sits here and cries,
21 they are broke, they have no money, we can't
22 do this and do that, but they want us to be
23 their scapegoats. Scrantonians to be their
24 scapegoat to take over a church. Why?
25 Because their fiscal mismanagement of their
46
1 own funds. They can't run their churches
2 properly, they don't know what to do with
3 their money, yet the Roman Catholic Churches
4 is one of the richest businesses in the
5 world starting from Rome across.
6 Why should we take this church and
7 allow our heritage to be torn down and make
8 a blacktop parking lot to satisfy a few? To
9 take over and worry about a basketball team
10 the season. There is parking down the
11 street at the old tennis courts that are
12 part of the University or whatever they may
13 have been. Give them that to park. They
14 can run up and down the court for hours,
15 they can't walk a half a block to park the
16 car? I think it's absurd.
17 My intent is to keep this church,
18 this facility, in it's entirety as it is
19 today, to restore it. Mr. McGoff, you made
20 comments in the Scranton Times, oh, it's
21 going to cost this or tear it down might be
22 feasible. It's not your problem. It's my
23 problem or it's whoever's problem with the
24 Diocese that buys it. We are going to put
25 it on the taxrolls. We not going to give it
47
1 a free parking lot, if you are going to do
2 that for these people down there then how
3 about we have one up on East Mountain and
4 somewhere else in the city, and South Side
5 and North Scranton, we just start making
6 free parking lots out of every blighted
7 parking lot in this city.
8 And what determines blight? What
9 determines how it gets from here to there
10 ahead of everybody else. How does it jump
11 the line? I would like to know that,
12 please. There is none. There is no common
13 sense behind it. You cannot take burned out
14 buildings that have been sitting for years
15 that should have been torn down, put up for
16 auction, with the contingency you buy it you
17 must build on it. You put it on the
18 taxrolls. It's about making money in this
19 city.
20 Not the nonprofits who give nothing
21 like the University, you know, sure they
22 give great educations, but they don't pay
23 their fair share. All of them. I don't
24 care if it's a church, rectory, it should
25 pay taxes because it's not a house of
48
1 worship. These are the things that we are
2 missing here and we are missing it big.
3 We lost how much from Molly
4 Brannigan's and how much more with all of
5 the other hundreds or hundreds and millions
6 of dollars? We should never take a second
7 position to anyone. We should always be
8 first. They go down, we get paid, and the
9 banks don't want to do business with them
10 then pay us off and give them 100 percent of
11 their money. We are their scapegoats and
12 it's got to stop. You got to confirm this
13 is a business. I don't know care how you
14 look at it.
15 You must take a hardcore look at
16 this, and tonight I'm asking you, this
17 contract is probably null and void because
18 to the benefits of some of us Catholics
19 Martino is no longer in charge, and I
20 applaud that, because I have seen the
21 Catholic church destroying the house of
22 worship where people were baptized, they
23 grew up in, they were married in and they
24 died and were buried in now destroyed. We
25 can't continue to do this. Let them run
49
1 their own house. They're big boys and
2 girls, let them pay their fair share. Not a
3 dollar from the City of Scranton to pull
4 them out of the fire. I'm asking tonight
5 that this be tabled, put on the back burner,
6 because Martino is no longer involved. He
7 signed this contract, the solicitor probably
8 would be better suited for this, but I
9 believe the contract is now null and void
10 because there is new head of the Diocese and
11 he needs that opportunity. We sent him a
12 letter and we addressed it to him and asking
13 him now to pay attention to this because
14 Martino isn't here, and I believe Mr. Minora
15 would agree with me that contract is now
16 null and void.
17 MS. GATELLI: Mr. Bolus, I don't know
18 if you heard me tell Mr. Spindler, but we
19 discussed this in caucus with the
20 Architectural Heritage Association and we
21 have all agreed that we are voting "no."
22 We aren't going to table it, we are
23 voting "no."
24 MS. BOLUS: I heard that,
25 Mrs. Gatelli, but I want to be here tonight,
50
1 I took the time to come here, I wanted this
2 on the record, I want the sincerity of what
3 we are saying and what the Heritage
4 Association is saying and council and
5 everybody in the city to understanding. We
6 are Scrantonians and that's what comes
7 first. Not greed or misconceptions and
8 little ideas and backdoor deals. It has to
9 stop and stop now, and I thank you for your
10 consideration. I'm sure everybody else
11 will, too.
12 MS. GATELLI: I hope you are around
13 when St. Francis is closed --
14 MR. BOLUS: We'll buy them all. It
15 doesn't make a difference. You could have
16 Sister Gatelli, Sister Fanucci, Reverend --
17 MR. MCGOFF: And Bishop Bolus. Jean
18 Suetta. Sorry. I'm sorry, Fay Franus. My
19 apologies.
20 MS. FRANUS: Fay Franus. I would
21 like to applaud you for voting "no" for Holy
22 Cross Church, but one thing, Mr. McGoff, I
23 saw who you mentioned many times that the
24 neighbors in Bellevue don't mind this
25 parking lot. I lived in Bellevue all my
51
1 life, the neighbors, over 30 of them that I
2 spoke with, do not want a parking lot there
3 and they very much so object. I don't know
4 who you spoke to, I'd love to know the
5 names, because I don't know one person that
6 wanted that torn down. Not one. So you
7 don't speak for the neighbors in Bellevue.
8 Another thing, Mr. Courtright, was
9 there a letter from the Department of
10 Justice saying basically this is an
11 oversight and they are just going to let
12 this go?
13 MR. COURTRIGHT: They acknowledged a
14 letter from the city, they had a set of two,
15 one from 2008 and one from 2009 telling the
16 City of Scranton to correct the letters that
17 were sent erroneously or in error.
18 MS. FRANUS: Well, I definitely feel
19 there should be an investigation because I
20 believe from what I understand there was
21 grants from 2002 up until now that Chief
22 Elliott may have applied for -- or whoever
23 the police chief might have been by then,
24 but I think there should be an investigation
25 of all of the grants that were asked for and
52
1 did they come in front of council for
2 approval.
3 MR. COURTRIGHT: They are the only
4 two I'm aware of.
5 MS. FRANUS: Pardon me? No, I'm not
6 talking about -- maybe you are only aware of
7 two years, I'm saying check back and see
8 exactly how many grants --
9 MR. COURTRIGHT: I can do that.
10 MS. FRANUS: How many grants went in
11 front of the Justice and got approval, even
12 received the money without council's
13 approval. It might take some digging, but
14 it's certainly worth checking into. I'd
15 like to know if Chief Elliott deliberately
16 said this without council's approval
17 knowing, fully knowing that council didn't
18 approve this. That's what I would like to
19 know.
20 MR. COURTRIGHT: All right. I will
21 absolutely check that.
22 MS. FRANUS: And I hope that you
23 have a public meeting with the person, the
24 grant writer.
25 MR. COURTRIGHT: My fear is -- I just
53
1 told her time for a second. My fear is that
2 when this girl met with us, right, I don't
3 want to point any fingers, I think she was
4 mislead and I wouldn't want her to be
5 persecuted for something that she really
6 didn't do --
7 MS. FRANUS: Bill, excuse me. I
8 don't mean for the people to speak with her,
9 I just mean for the public to be in
10 attendance like a caucus or anything. I
11 don't mean for the public to ask questions I
12 just meant the public to be there.
13 MR. COURTRIGHT: I will ask for Mrs.
14 Evans' meeting, I will ask for a meeting
15 with all of us.
16 MS. FRANUS: Because if there is
17 nothing to hide there is not a question that
18 could be asked to her that she shouldn't
19 be --
20 MR. COURTRIGHT: I agree.
21 MS. FRANUS: Like I said, this is
22 very important, just not 2008-2009.
23 MR. COURTRIGHT: Do you know, Fay,
24 what you said, I told everybody at the
25 meetings, this is exactly what would happen
54
1 and this is exactly what is happening. The
2 people want to know and they have every
3 right to know.
4 MS. FRANUS: We have a right to
5 know.
6 MR. COURTRIGHT: They have every
7 right to know.
8 MS. FRANUS: And maybe somebody will
9 squirm and they do not want to answer the
10 questions, but we have a right to know.
11 MR. COURTRIGHT: Yes, you do.
12 MS. FRANUS: And we also want to
13 know how many of these grants did not come
14 in front of city council for approval and
15 who authorized it and I don't think this is
16 just an oversight.
17 MR. COURTRIGHT: I will absolutely
18 check. I will go back to 2002.
19 MS. FRANUS: Yes, please. Like I
20 said, it might take some digging to go over
21 all of the minutes, but --
22 MR. COURTRIGHT: No, I'll do it. I
23 think you are 100 percent --
24 MS. FRANUS: I'd like to know how
25 many grants, what are the amounts, what were
55
1 though for and how many came in front of
2 council for approval and how many did not
3 come in front of council for approval and
4 how much money was given to this police
5 department. Thank you very much.
6 MR. COURTRIGHT: You are welcome.
7 MR. MCGOFF: Jean Suetta.
8 MS. SUETTA: Are you sure?
9 MR. MCGOFF: I'll double-check it.
10 MS. SUETTA: I came spiffy, huh? You
11 know how far I chased him for them?
12 MS. FANUCCI: Nice.
13 MS. SUETTA: Jean Suetta.
14 MS. FANUCCI: I'm going to tell her
15 you said that.
16 MS. SUETTA: What did he say?
17 MS. FANUCCI: He said nice legs.
18 MS. SUETTA: Nice. I am nicey nice.
19 I just got a couple of questions: One,
20 whatever happened to the lighted ballfield
21 for our softball players?
22 MS. FANUCCI: We don't know.
23 MS. SUETTA: Is there a grant coming
24 for that?
25 MR. COURTRIGHT: I don't know.
56
1 MS. SUETTA: And you know this lady
2 that was mislead, get the jackass that
3 mislead her here.
4 MS. FANUCCI: We can't curse.
5 MS. SUETTA: I'm not cursing. That's
6 an animal or a donkey. Get the donkey down
7 here, all right? I have to say hello to
8 Ziggy Levandowski. I met him in the
9 hospital, we were getting tests. Hi, Zig, I
10 hope you are feeling better. Thank you very
11 much. You don't know who he is.
12 The weeds. The jungle is still on
13 Greenridge Street.
14 MR. COURTRIGHT: You're right.
15 MS. FANUCCI: You are right. I saw
16 it the other day.
17 MS. SUETTA: I know. Are they
18 getting fined?
19 MR. COURTRIGHT: Didn't they cut a
20 little bit?
21 MS. FANUCCI: They did a little bit
22 in the beginning, but that was right in the
23 beginning.
24 MR. COURTRIGHT: They did do
25 something way back.
57
1 MS. SUETTA: Look it, even Corrugated
2 Box is letting their place go to hell now.
3 MR. COURTRIGHT: Who?
4 MS. SUETTA: Corrugated Box.
5 MS. FANUCCI: That's new though.
6 You never told us that before.
7 MS. SUETTA: No, today, yeah. Now,
8 my house was robbed Sunday.
9 MS. FANUCCI: No, it wasn't.
10 MS. SUETTA: Yes, it was. Now I'm a
11 victim. He better start giving our cops
12 some kind of help because we got hooligans
13 our neighborhood. You can't say nothing
14 to them. If you do, the one called me
15 something. You want to tell me what he
16 called you?
17 MR. COURTRIGHT: No. No. Please
18 don't.
19 MS. SUETTA: Twenty years ago I would
20 have caught him on that skateboard. I
21 couldn't catch him, but if I catch them I
22 can't hit them anyway because they are 14
23 and 15 years old. All my life my doors went
24 open, that's how crazy. I got three dogs
25 and a cat and they robbed my house.
58
1 Nothing?
2 MS. FANUCCI: Sorry.
3 MS. SUETTA: They invaded my privacy,
4 you know? I'm investing I. Got a couple of
5 the banks looking -- a couple of the
6 changers checking their videos, and God
7 forbid if I find out, you know? Two days I
8 ain't slept. It's no fun when somebody goes
9 in your house and you are not there, and I
10 have three dogs. They ain't afraid of
11 nothing, you know? And I had -- they took a
12 jug of money, a gallon jug of money, one of
13 those pretzel ones, those big one,
14 three-quarters full. How they got it out of
15 the house I don't know, but they did it on a
16 Sunday, broad daylight. I was gone from 1
17 to 5.
18 Now, why? What would I do if they
19 come in my house and I'm there after bed?
20 Hit them while they are there don't hit them
21 with they are leaving; right? Am I right or
22 wrong?
23 MR. COURTRIGHT: I'm not going to
24 give any advice, Jean, because if you do
25 that --
59
1 MS. SUETTA: No. Well, I'll tell you
2 what, the officer that came to my house was
3 very nice, Anthony Redna? Redner?
4 MS. GATELLI: Renda.
5 MS. SUETTA: Renda. Very nice
6 officer. He couldn't say how I was holding
7 my composure, but then I lost it.
8 MR. COURTRIGHT: He must have got a
9 kick out of you.
10 MS. SUETTA: Well, then he got a
11 little scared then after awhile, you know?
12 MR. COURTRIGHT: I don't blame him.
13 MS. SUETTA: But that's all. You
14 got to get more cops.
15 MR. COURTRIGHT: I agree.
16 MS. SUETTA: I mean, I got the
17 scanner on, they are getting run ragged.
18 All right. Thanks.
19 MR. MCGOFF: Lee Morgan.
20 MR. MORGAN: Good evening, Council.
21 The first thing I have here is I think that
22 the city, council and the mayor should
23 consider turning over the city's pension
24 plan to the state. We have wrestled with
25 this demon many times, and to be honest with
60
1 you, I don't know see how the City of
2 Scranton is ever going to meet the
3 obligations we are going to have with that
4 pension plan. I mean, we keep talking about
5 it and councils have changed, administrators
6 have changed, it's been millions off dollars
7 short, and my personal opinion is that
8 Mellon Bank in the beginning when I first
9 came to council a long time ago may have
10 been doing a fairly good job, but to be
11 honest with you all of the pensions are just
12 collapsing and when we look at the city and
13 the amount of pressure that the residents
14 are under, I don't see any possible way that
15 the residents should keep bleeding them the
16 way they are being bled.
17 I really think it's time for
18 leadership in this council. I'm wondering
19 has council ever sat down with Austin Burke
20 and maybe considered a plan for the Scranton
21 Lace building that Mr. Boscov owns? I have
22 had an opportunity to speak to him and the
23 developer about green technology jobs when
24 the KOZ's were being killed by the Scranton
25 School District, and believe me that was a
61
1 great thing for the city.
2 You know, I just -- I had to leave
3 here before, I mean, I just couldn't sit
4 here because I sit here week after week and
5 I watch politics spin completely out of
6 control and everybody wants the upper hand
7 in politics, but the people in this city
8 don't have the upper hand because this city
9 has been so mismanaged that it's beyond
10 belief, and council has the obligation to do
11 investigations and in my opinion it's just
12 not happening, and I don't know if it's ever
13 going to happen. We have cashed out
14 blighted properties all over the city. We
15 have tore a lot of them down, we don't even
16 maintain the lots they are on. After we
17 ripped the property down who is maintaining
18 those lots? Who is doing anything? Nobody
19 is doing anything.
20 Today a lot of people came here I
21 think with the focus of the Scranton Times
22 put on it that what was happening the Holy
23 Cross was the most important issue in this
24 city. The most important issue in this city
25 is the survival of the city itself and it's
62
1 residents. Unemployment is 17 percent. I
2 mean, when you look at all of the numbers,
3 the discouraged workers that stop looking,
4 and my question for this council is do you
5 have the answers? Because you know
6 something, I think everybody should -- I
7 appreciate anybody who runs for a public
8 office even, Mrs. Gatelli, there is talk you
9 may run a write-in, and you know what? I
10 think you should. And, Mrs. Fanucci, if you
11 feel you should I think you should. And I
12 think that any resident in this city who
13 thinks they should do a write-in should do a
14 write-in, but we need some solutions to the
15 problems that we have and we are just not
16 getting them. We are playing politics here
17 with people's lives and it's just not right.
18 Thank you.
19 MR. MCGOFF: Jim Talerico.
20 MR. TALERICO: Good evening, Council
21 members. My name is Jim Talerico. I want
22 to speak about the church on the corner of
23 Fifth and Broadway. Give you some
24 background on me, I'm Catholic, I go to
25 church every Sunday. I went to Mother
63
1 Cabrini School for eight years, which is now
2 closed. I was an altar boy and served mass
3 7:00 every day and at this time you had to
4 Latin to be an altar boy. My brother was
5 the maintenance man at St. Lucy's Church,
6 his wife sang in the choir, his
7 mother-in-law was the sacristan, my mother
8 helper her out once in awhile and I worked
9 for her on Saturday. She paid me 50 cents
10 for the whole day.
11 I'm a commercial real estate
12 appraiser and a real estate broker. I'm the
13 President of Scranton Appraisal Group and
14 Scranton Development Group. I have been in
15 real estate for over 40 years, completed
16 many appraisals on churches in Lackawanna
17 and Luzerne Counties. I have spoken with
18 Bishop Joseph F. Martino, Chancellor James
19 P. Early, Father Francis Torsick and many
20 other priests.
21 I have completed an appraisal of St.
22 John's Baptist Catholic Church which is
23 located right around the corner at 1314-1316
24 Broadway Street. We have completed many
25 detailed narrative commercial reports 50 to
64
1 100 pages from the sales comparison
2 approach, the income approach, and we don't
3 usually do the cost approach because
4 churches are very old, but we do estimate
5 what the land value is. Most Catholic
6 churches are masonry structures and are of
7 Superior quality and in excellent condition.
8 Most churches are in residential zones which
9 does not allow commercial uses.
10 However, city council and the zoning
11 board agreed to rezone Catholic churches to
12 commercial uses, the Diocese can lease these
13 churches to lend a commercial use such as a
14 DayCare center, office use, nursing home or
15 other limited commercial uses. In this
16 economic downfall, Scranton Diocese is
17 losing parishioners and are going to sell
18 the structure below market value. If the
19 Diocese leases the churches for limited
20 commercial use they can benefit by
21 collecting additional income and maybe in
22 the future there will be an increase in
23 parishioners and the city can collect taxes
24 on those properties.
25 Also, I did a church in Lynburg,
65
1 Byzantine Catholic Church of Lynburg located
2 on Gravel Pond Road. What they did was they
3 converted that into a bank a couple of years
4 ago.
5 The church on Fifth and Broadway may
6 have other uses available, what is the value
7 of the church as it is now? I will do an
8 appraisal on this structure at no charge
9 just to see what the value is. I would like
10 to save the Catholic churches and schools
11 and offer my experience in appraising
12 churches. That's all I have to say. Thank
13 you very much.
14 MR. MCGOFF: Thank you. Charlie
15 Newcomb.
16 MR. NEWCOMB: Good evening, City
17 Council. I am here this evening on two
18 topics. One is has become over the last
19 couple of months a personal mission of mine.
20 This past April we lost my grandmother, but
21 the worst part is we had to bury her in the
22 Washburn Street Cemetery. Why I say the
23 worst part is that we had to bury her in the
24 Washburn Street Cemetery is, if any one of
25 you drive by this overgrown deplorable
66
1 cemetery, you will see how sad it truly is.
2 My mother had to bury her mom in this
3 deplorable place. This past weekend it was
4 so bad that my own mother couldn't get out
5 of my vehicle to pay respects to her mom
6 because the cemetery is in such a disgraced
7 condition. There is overgrown grass all
8 summer. We have to cut the grass around the
9 tombstones ourselves. I'm not the only
10 person that goes there. You go over there
11 on a weekend you will find 10, 20 people
12 doing the same thing.
13 There is no phone number listed for
14 the cemetery. I had to get a phone number
15 from our funeral director. I called the
16 gentleman on his cell phone to voice my
17 complaint and he told me there is no money
18 to do anything. That's not my problem,
19 that's not your problem, that's not
20 anybody's problem that is buried in that
21 cemetery that paid money to take care of
22 their graves. It truly has become a
23 disgusting condition to put it bluntly.
24 If my home, your home, anybody's
25 home looked like this cemetery did you would
67
1 be cited for blight, so I ask this city to
2 cite these people for blight and give them
3 30 days to clean up the cemetery and cite
4 them every day because I should not have to
5 go over there and clean up for something
6 that we paid for and neither should anybody
7 else have to.
8 There is hundreds, upon thousands of
9 people in this city that have loved ones
10 buried in that cemetery and it's truly a
11 disgrace. Not only is the gras overgrown,
12 but there is tombstones toppled all over the
13 place. I was told by a gentleman that fixes
14 the tombstones that these are not cause of
15 vandals, it's because the poor drainage in
16 the cemetery and not properly maintained.
17 We buried my grandmother on April 3
18 and it took until July 2 for somebody to
19 come over and fill in the grave because it
20 had sank so bad. It's truly sad. I have
21 family members buried in both Cathedral and
22 Dunmore cemeteries and if you go to those
23 cemeteries you leave there in peace. You
24 cannot do this at that Washburn Street
25 Cemetery. I drive by there ever day going
68
1 and coming from work and this summer truly
2 is the worst it's ever been.
3 To move onto other topic that I have
4 come here time and time again, I ask did
5 anybody receive my e-mails that I sent two
6 weeks ago for the water problem?
7 MS. EVANS: Yes.
8 MR. NEWCOMB: If you can see from
9 these e-mails, this past spring my wife and
10 I put thousands of dollars into our property
11 and 35 tons of soil and dirt to bring up our
12 property. Our foundation costs us $4,000 to
13 fix to stop the water from coming in.
14 Fortunately, for me we solved the problem
15 with the exception that when the water comes
16 up over the street and there is no where
17 else to go it's going to come in the yard.
18 The flooding this summer has just been
19 unreal. There is mosquitos right in front
20 of my house. You can't even let the kids go
21 outside because the water just ponds there.
22 Nobody seems -- Mrs. Gatelli, I know
23 you had the city come over and they put in a
24 drain, that works to get rid of some of the
25 problem, but it doesn't help it. I know
69
1 Mrs. Evans you have tried and time and time
2 again to help, but it's just getting bad and
3 neighbors are actually come outside and they
4 cry because they say, "Why doesn't anybody
5 want to do anything about this problem?"
6 No offense, Mr. McGoff, but I'm
7 still waiting for you to come over because I
8 know you said about two years you would come
9 over and look at the problem and you'd take
10 personal interest in it and nothing has
11 happened. Like I said, I think I helped the
12 problem to stop the water from coming into
13 my home, but unfortunately the rest of the
14 neighborhood is just -- is getting hit
15 pretty hard.
16 MS. GATELLI: Did you get any relief
17 from Keyser Avenue?
18 MR. NEWCOMB: No.
19 MS. GATELLI: You know, that there
20 is no storm drains up there?
21 MR. NEWCOMB: No, that's the problem
22 the water needs to be stopped from Keyser
23 Avenue --
24 MS. GATELLI: I know.
25 MR. NEWCOMB: And it comes from
70
1 Keyser Avenue and we are the lowest point
2 and that's were where it settles, so you
3 either need to put drains right across
4 Keyser Avenue or at the bottom of us you
5 need to make some kind of gully system or
6 something to stop the water because when the
7 engineers came over from the Sewer Authority
8 they said there is a 18-inch pipe that goes
9 into a 24-inch pipe -- or, I'm sorry, I have
10 it backwards, a 24-inch pipe that goes into
11 a 18-inch pipe. That's not going to hold
12 that type of water. You are talking about
13 thousands of gallons of water that comes
14 down within a matter of ten minutes. It's
15 really, really sad.
16 And one other quick question I have
17 if I can, do we know if we charge insurance
18 companies for the use of Rescue 1 in car
19 accident? Did we use to?
20 MS. FANUCCI: I don't know that.
21 MR. COURTRIGHT: We might have in
22 the past, I don't think we do now.
23 MR. NEWCOMB: I think that's
24 something that we look into to make revenue
25 for the city. You see them all of the time
71
1 responding to accidents and the ambulance
2 charge for their services, I can't see why
3 Rescue 1 of the city can't charge for their
4 services as well. But, personally, I ask
5 you to please look into the Washburn Street
6 Cemetery because it really is a sad
7 situation. It's really, really bad. Thank
8 you.
9 MR. MCGOFF: Marie Schumacher. Or,
10 excuse me, I'm sorry, I keep jumping ahead.
11 Chris Hughes.
12 MR. HUGHES: Good evening, Council.
13 Thanks for giving me the chance to speak
14 tonight. My name is Chris Hughes. I'm 25,
15 I'm a lifelong resident of the city. I want
16 to come tonight because I see a problem in
17 the city, but I don't hear anybody
18 presenting any kind of positive solutions
19 and any positive alternatives. The problem
20 I see is blighted properties and what
21 happens to blighted properties once the
22 bricks, the mortar and the tenants are gone
23 for months and possibly years at a time.
24 Right now where I live, in the
25 section of West Side where I live, there are
72
1 two vacant properties completely vacant, no
2 buildings whatsoever within two blocks of
3 each other. One of those properties sits he
4 at the intersection of Oram Street and North
5 Bromley Avenue, that site apparently owned
6 by a group called 1222 Oram Street, LLC.
7 I'm hoping from what I have been told by
8 neighbors that's a group of neighbors that
9 bought the property. I'm hoping they do
10 something to develop it.
11 The property that I'm more concerned
12 with because it doesn't seem like anybody is
13 doing anything with it sits at the corner of
14 North Bromley and Pettibone Street just up
15 from the Turkey Hill on Main Avenue in West
16 Side. I don't know if anybody -- if you are
17 familiar with that. Mr. Courtright is
18 giving me a nod. I'm coming here because I
19 want to learn a few things. I would like to
20 see the property positively developed
21 probably to the chagrin of many, but
22 possibly as a neighborhood community garden.
23 A project like this would probably solve at
24 least two problems in the city, it would
25 develop a blighted property and something
73
1 positive and it could foster a sense of
2 community that I think is missing in the
3 City of Scranton these days.
4 There is a couple of preliminary
5 questions that I have, and I'm sure that if
6 I got any kind of approval for this kind of
7 a project there would be many more that
8 would come forward down the road. I guess
9 the first question would be, could I as a
10 civilian obtain any kind of community
11 development grant, block development grant
12 for this kind of project? If I could where
13 could I go to apply for that kind of grant?
14 What office, whether it be in the city or
15 the county level. Could somebody who owns
16 the property, how much it's worth, how to
17 obtain it. And I guess the final
18 preliminary question would be what kind of
19 approval what I need to get from
20 neighborhoods, there is two schools in the
21 community, Charles Sumner and John Marshall,
22 would I need any kind of approval from the
23 zoning boards to get this kind of project
24 moving forward. If there is any kind of
25 correspondence, I could deal with the
74
1 members of council. I'd be happy to give
2 you my e-mail address off camera, my cell
3 phone number, whatever I could give you to
4 keep moving forward.
5 If you don't have answers tonight I
6 understand because it's probably something
7 you didn't expect, but I appreciate any kind
8 of information you can give me because I'd
9 like to see, like I said, something positive
10 happening with the sites.
11 MS. FANUCCI: Certainly I can help
12 you with the contact OECD to try to obtain
13 type of funding, but I think your first
14 source is trying to find out who owns the
15 property, so I think we should start there
16 to see if it's available.
17 MR. HUGHES: Would be from the County
18 Assessor's Office?
19 MS. GATELLI: The Assessor's.
20 MS. FANUCCI: The Assessor's Office
21 would be where you would go for that, and
22 then after that it would be OECD and you
23 would want to contact them and tell them
24 what it is that you looking for, but you
25 would have to acquisition of the property
75
1 first.
2 MR. HUGHES: Sure.
3 MS. FANUCCI: So that's your first
4 step.
5 MR. HUGHES: And this is probably
6 more of an opinion question, but would that
7 be better served as like a civilian thing or
8 would it be better --
9 MS. FANUCCI: What are you trying to
10 do, you want to do a community center?
11 MR. HUGHES: No, no, like --
12 MS. FANUCCI: Community gardens.
13 MR. HUGHES: Like an outdoor
14 community garden. My vision is to have it
15 fenced in, to use a Scranton based business
16 which would be the Earth Box business to
17 have container gardens set up so I wouldn't
18 have to worry about tilling land or anything
19 like that, and use existing parking on the
20 sides of the streets.
21 MS. FANUCCI: Well, you could
22 probably start a nonprofit then, right?
23 MR. HUGHES: That would be my guess,
24 but --
25 MS. FANUCCI: I would think that
76
1 nonprofit would be your best route.
2 MS. GATELLI: And there is a
3 gentleman that came here, I don't recall his
4 name, that was doing community gardens.
5 MR. HUGHES: Really?
6 MS. FANUCCI: He has been here for
7 awhile. Actually, I do have his e-mail.
8 MS. EVANS: It's Mr. Murphy. I
9 think he resides in Greenridge. He was
10 interested in that. I don't know that it
11 came to fruition. I know I had sent some
12 volunteers to attend his meetings and sadly
13 the meetings weren't conducted. But I
14 think, you know, also it would to your
15 advantage when applying for a CDBG grant,
16 for example. First of all, you have to
17 ascertain and if this is a low to moderate
18 income area; and then secondly, your chances
19 are improved if you are a group that is
20 applying rather than an individual and, of
21 course, the current round of CDBG's are now
22 in process and that is for funding within
23 the 2010 fiscal year, so that in terms of a
24 CDBG grant they are going to need to wait
25 until next summer for application and
77
1 receipt of funds then probably in 2011.
2 MR. HUGHES: Okay. Do have an
3 estimated time as to when the grant would
4 have be to sent in?
5 MS. FANUCCI: Just in response, I
6 want to say this first, we don't believe
7 it's in a low to moderate income area.
8 MR. HUGHES: I don't believe it is
9 either.
10 MS. FANUCCI: So you would not be
11 able to apply for that funding, but there
12 would be other sources depending on what it
13 is you are looking for. If you leave your
14 e-mail with Neil I certainly will contact
15 you and see what we can do.
16 MR. HUGHES: Thank you.
17 MR. MCGOFF: Marie Schumacher.
18 MS. SCHUMACHER: Marie Schumacher,
19 city resident and member of the Taxpayers'
20 Association. Before I start with the
21 remarks that I prepared for tonight, did I
22 hear correctly that we will have a new
23 Recovery Plan imposed on us that will not
24 come to council or come before the voters?
25 MS. FANUCCI: I believe it has to
78
1 come to council because I think we have to
2 adopt it as legislation 'am I correct, Amil?
3 MR. MINORA: Yes.
4 MS. EVANS: YES.
5 MS. FANUCCI: So it does have to
6 come before council.
7 MS. SCHUMACHER: I misheard, okay.
8 Now, the capital budget, Section 904 of the
9 Home Rule Charter states: "Capital budget
10 shall contain: One, a summary of it's
11 contents. Two, a list of all capital
12 improvements which are proposed to be
13 undertaken during five fiscal years and
14 ensuing with appropriate supporting
15 information as to the necessity for such
16 improvements. Three, cost estimated, method
17 of financing, and recommended time schedule
18 for such improvements. Four, estimated
19 annual cost of operating and maintaining
20 facilities to be constructed or acquired.
21 Five, inventory replacement schedule for
22 purchase and replacement of major
23 equipment."
24 I have to tell you that this is the
25 poorest excuse for capital budget I have
79
1 ever seen.
2 MS. EVANS: I agree.
3 MS. SCHUMACHER: I cannot believe
4 that anybody didn't have enough pride to not
5 bother submitting this. Not only is it
6 several months late, but it is totally out
7 of comport with the Home Rule Charter.
8 Where are the projects within each
9 department? Why did council approve the
10 $50,000 budgeted for Genesis Wildlife Center
11 to Leadership Lackawanna for Hanlon's Grove?
12 Where is the greenhouse funding? Why are
13 nonmunicipal entities allowed to initiate
14 capital projects? Every capital project
15 should be in the city budget and it should
16 be shown as approved by council with a
17 nonmunicipal entity shown as the funding
18 sources once it is approved by council.
19 We have been out of compliance for
20 years and years. I think the last one of
21 the Connors' administration the only one
22 that was done correctly, and I think it's
23 time that you make this administration shape
24 up. It is just terrible. Where are the
25 streets to be paved? There is money in the
80
1 OECD budget that you have received for today
2 to have streets paving. That's a capital
3 project that should be in there. I just
4 don't know. I don't know why you let them
5 get away with this and I think it's time
6 that this year you stop it and get a correct
7 budget.
8 MS. EVANS: Ms. Schumacher, I agree
9 with you --
10 MS. SCHUMACHER: 5-D -- my time.
11 I've got five here.
12 MS. EVANS: I'm sorry.
13 MS. SCHUMACHER: Thank you though.
14 5-D, I ask council to obtain the full list
15 of applications, not just those selected for
16 inclusion in the CDBG budget that's proposed
17 to you tonight. Why are there no non
18 agilged funds for emergency fuel help? We
19 all know what shape people are in
20 economically, we know what's happening to
21 utility rates and not a penny for emergency
22 fuel help? That is -- that is terrible.
23 I mean, I wonder why I waste my time
24 going to these meetings when they look for
25 citizen input and you take your time and you
81
1 go down and you remind them of these things
2 and then forward comes the budget, but I
3 think we should all, every citizen, should
4 see all of the applications that were
5 received and their recommendations and I
6 would like to that you would request tonight
7 that we all do see the all of the
8 applications.
9 5-E on tonight's agenda. It should
10 be publically that SLIBCO is not losing any
11 funding in this transaction, rather SLIBCO
12 will receive a quarter of a million dollars
13 from the federal stimulus funding. This
14 transaction begs the question of where the
15 CDBG-R for recovery itemized budget is
16 showing all of the stimulus funding. It's
17 referenced in the backup, but where is it?
18 The city clerk's office doesn't have it.
19 This dash "R" plan is listed in the backup,
20 it should be available in the clerks office
21 and I would recommend that you see that
22 that's received before next week's meeting.
23 Speaking of the Clerk's Office, I
24 would like to make a recommendation
25 regarding authorities. During -- may I
82
1 finish this thought? I'll bring the rest
2 next week?
3 MR. MCGOFF: Please.
4 MS. SCHUMACHER: During the August
5 recess the deal the Parking Authority made
6 with Molly Brannigans came to light. I
7 called the clerk's office to request an
8 appointment to review the Scranton Parking
9 Authority 2009 meeting minutes only to be
10 informed that city council does not receive
11 these minutes. I was going to go over that
12 third item, but since we taxpayers are the
13 ones that are left holding the bag if the
14 authorities' default, I believe council
15 should request minutes of each authority be
16 forwarded to council, even an open records
17 request if that's what it takes to get
18 compliance in a timely manner and so noted
19 when received in your agenda item three.
20 And God Lord willing, I'll be back next week
21 with the rest of my comments. Thank you.
22 MR. MCGOFF: Jim Stucker.
23 MR. STUCKER: How you doing?
24 MR. COURTRIGHT: Hi, Jim.
25 MR. STUCKER: Hi. I was at the
83
1 festival, I had a good time, three days, it
2 worked out four days.
3 MR. COURTRIGHT: Good.
4 MR. STUCKER: And what about them
5 houses now, the one on Greenridge, are they
6 going to get --
7 MR. COURTRIGHT: I know. They
8 boarded it up though, Jim. They didn't tear
9 it down yet, but it's boarded up.
10 MR. STUCKER: When are they ripping
11 it down?
12 MR. COURTRIGHT: I don't know.
13 MR. STUCKER: And I was wondering
14 about that street by the courthouse, by the
15 post office courthouse, that road is bad.
16 They have to put a new road in there.
17 MR. COURTRIGHT: Yep.
18 MR. STUCKER: All right. And Pocius
19 they said, I don't know if it was one of
20 your friends come into Sheeley's Drug Store,
21 he said Pocius found my bike.
22 MR. COURTRIGHT: Okay.
23 MR. STUCKER: He had a green blazar.
24 He said he knows you.
25 MR. COURTRIGHT: He knows me?
84
1 MR. STUCKER: Yeah.
2 MR. COURTRIGHT: What bike, Jim, not
3 the scooter?
4 MR. STUCKER: No my brand new
5 mountain bike.
6 MR. COURTRIGHT: And what happened,
7 it was stolen?
8 MR. STUCKER: Yeah, it was stolen
9 outside of Bernie's Bar.
10 MR. COURTRIGHT: And they said I have
11 it?
12 MR. STUCKER: Well, Pocius --
13 MR. COURTRIGHT: Pocius?
14 MR. STUCKER: Yeah. Pocius said he
15 gave it to you.
16 MR. COURTRIGHT: I don't think
17 Mr. Pocius has your bike, Jim.
18 MR. STUCKER: I just talked to a guy
19 in a green blazar, he said you -- he said
20 Pocius -- the guy in the green blazar told
21 me, I don't know his name, he said he will
22 give you a call or Pocius give him a call
23 and said they found the bike, he did, so he
24 is supposed to get back to you about it, so
25 you might have to call Pocius.
85
1 MR. COURTRIGHT: Jim, I don't think
2 Mr. Pocius has your bike, Buddy. I think
3 they were teasing you.
4 MR. STUCKER: The kid was tall, a
5 tall kid and two other kids, too.
6 MR. COURTRIGHT: You know what to do,
7 Jim, get his name so that I can call him
8 because I think he is fooling around with
9 you.
10 MR. STUCKER: All right. Now we got
11 these skateboards and they are on on where I
12 live on Adams Avenue in that big tall
13 building, right around the corner of
14 Mulberry, the kids live in this building,
15 they were there tonight with the skateboards
16 bouncing off -- the cops -- this cop here
17 went right up the street, he had to come